RESUMO
Objective To compare the efficacy, safety, and survivability of TCbHP versus AC-THP in the neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-positive breast cancer in real-world. Methods Clinical data of patients with HER2 positive breast cancer, who have received TCbHP or AC-THP as neoadjuvant therapy and completed surgery in 11 third-class hospitals in various cities of Hebei Province, were retrospectively collected.The total pathological complete remission (tpCR) rate, the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse reactions and the completion rate of the given approaches were compared. Results A total of 110 cases were collected, including 78 cases in the TCbHP group and 32 cases in the AC-THP group.The tpCR rate of the TCbHP group was higher than that of the AC-THP group, but the difference was not statistically significant (64.10% vs. 56.25%, P=0.441).No significant difference was found in the breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) and axillary pathologic complete response (apCR) rates between the TCbHP group and the AC-THP group (70.51% vs. 56.25%, P=0.150;78.21% vs. 84.38%, P=0.462).Exploratory analysis revealed that the tpCR rate of the TCbHP group was significantly higher than that of the AC-THP group in patients with HR-positive breast cancer (51.11% vs. 22.22%, P=0.036).As for the patients with HR-negative breast cancer, the tpCR rate of the AC-THP group tended to be higher than that of the TCbHP group (100% vs. 81.82%, P=0.088).The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse reactions in the TCbHP group was slightly higher than that in the AC-THP group (12.82% vs. 9.38%, P=0.753).No deaths occurred in the whole group.Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the completion rate of the given approaches between the TCbHP group and the AC-THP group (92.31% vs. 90.63%, P=0.718). Conclusion In real-world clinical practice, the neoadjuvant therapy of TCbHP and AC-THP are effective, safe, and well tolerated among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.The tpCR rate between the two approaches was not significantly different.The AC-THP regimen could also be considered as one of the optimal regimens for HER2-positive breast cancer in neoadjuvant therapy.
RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To detect the methylation status of gastric cancer tissue genome by DNA methylation chip.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Methylation status of 6 samples of gastric cancer tissues and their matched adjacent tissues was analyzed using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation(MeDIP) combined with NibleGen chip. Significantly different methylated genes in promoter region and CpG island between two tissues were searched. Functions of these significantly different methylated genes were analyzed by Gene Ontology and Pathway assays.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In gene promoter regions, 113 significantly different methylated genes were identified in gastric cancer tissues, such as SHP1, FGF8 and CSF2RA, while 161 significantly different methylated genes were identified in their matched adjacent tissues, such as TNF, IGF2 and BMP7. In the CpG islands, 123 significantly different methylated genes were identified in gastric cancer tissues, such as WNT2B, JAK2 and TPT1, while 139 significantly different methylated genes were identified in their matched adjacent tissues, such as TNFRSF4, HOXC8 and NFYA. These genes located on different chromosomes. In gastric cancer tissues, the 1st and the 4th chromosomes had the most (both 11), the 18th and the 20th chromosomes had the least(both 1). In matched adjacent normal tissues, the 11th chromosome had the most (17), and no significantly different methylated gene was found on Y chromosome. These genes involved in many functions, such as protein phosphorylation, regulating cellular catabolism, ion transport, enzyme activity, transcriptional regulation, cell division, cell cycle regulation, and signal transduction.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>There are significant differences between gastric cancer tissues and their matched adjacent tissues in DNA methylation. DNA methylation genes locate on different chromosomes, and their number and distribution vary widely. These genes may be associated with many pathways in carcinogenesis.</p>
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of color doppler ultrasound(CDU)in combination of computed tomographie angiography(CTA)in diagnosis of the arteriosclerosis occlusion.Methods:43 patients with arteriosclerosis occlusion were assessed by color doppler ultrasound,CTA and digital subtraction angiography(DSA).By using DSA as the reference standard,the results were compared.Results The sensitivity.specificity,positive and negative predictive values for CDU were 82.96%,95.2%,94.92%,83.8% respectively.Those for CTA were 88.89%,96.75%,96.77%,88.81% respectively,and for the two combination,were 94.81%,99.17%,99.22%,94.44% respectively.Conclusion The color doppler ultrasound combined with CTA is an effective way in diagnosing arteriosclerosis occlusion.